Everything you need to build, run and govern an application

The first certified Peek archetype. A public intake form feeds a triage queue with SLA timers; reviewers request information, score completeness and route to an approver who records a rationale-backed decision. Sigma summarises, classifies and drafts — humans decide.

• Public intake form with completeness scoring
• Reviewer triage queue with SLA indicators
• Approval gate with mandatory rationale
• Automatic acknowledgement & decision notices

Provider and supplier enrollment screening at CMS limited / moderate / high risk levels. Enforces the 5% direct-or-indirect ownership fingerprint rule with a 30-day deadline, tracks capture appointments and FBI results, scores screening risk and routes to an accountable adjudicator. Sigma drafts letters, classifies provider types, extracts owners and recommends outcomes behind human approval.

• Applicant portal: submit enrollment, disclose owners, book fingerprint appointments
• 5% ownership rule as a computed field and decision table (managing employees included)
• 30-day fingerprint deadline with daily reminders and lapse escalation
• Capture-site desk with calendar, TCN and print-quality gate

Distilled from fraud, waste and abuse pilots: a public hotline form with anonymous reporting, a weighted triage score and routing table, chain-of-custody evidence, interview logs, legal review gate and OIG/DOJ referrals. Sigma summarises, classifies, extracts and drafts referral memos — humans decide.

• Public hotline form with anonymous reporting and acknowledgement
• Weighted triage score (dollars, evidence, credibility, public interest, complexity) with bands
• Routing table: full investigation, preliminary inquiry, OIG referral or administrative close
• Chain-of-custody evidence ledger with SHA-256 digests and interview log

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan operations distilled from MRRC QASP surveillance, MedCode coding review and clinical quality review. CORs plan monthly surveillance periods; reviewers grade sampled items with MedCode support tiers (Supported ≥ 75%, Uncertain 40–75%, Unsupported < 40%); performance is measured against the 95% acceptable quality level and rated Exceptional to Unsatisfactory; Corrective Action Requests are issued, answered by the contractor through an external portal, verified and closed. Sigma summarises, classifies and drafts — the COR rates.

• Monthly surveillance periods with computed defect rate and AQL test (95%)
• Weighted contractor performance score mapped to five ratings
• MedCode support-status tiers on reviewer/AI confidence
• CAR trigger table, CAR lifecycle with contractor portal and CO escalation

Distilled from the HRSA FTCA deeming pilot: health centers submit initial, redeeming or supplemental applications with sites, provider credentials, risk management activities and claims history. A weighted readiness score and recommendation table guide completeness and technical review; program officers record deemed, conditionally deemed or not-deemed determinations with conditions tracked to closure. Sigma summarises gaps, drafts letters and extracts credentials behind human approval.

• Health center portal with application draft, sites, credentials and risk activities
• Readiness score: credentialing, privileging, risk management plan, QI plan, claims review, training hours
• Recommendation table by readiness band and application type
• Approval-gated HRSA determination with conditions tracker to full deeming

NIST Risk Management Framework operations distilled from the Guardian pilot and SP 800-37 / 800-53 practice. Systems progress through the six RMF steps with an Authorizing Official approval gate; controls, POA&Ms, assessments, artifacts and risk acceptances are tracked per system. A weighted compliance score (coverage, assessment, POA&M and finding posture) feeds an ATO recommendation table — Full ATO, ATO with conditions, IATT or Deny — and High-impact systems cannot be authorized with critical POA&Ms open. Evidence ledgers and an audit page support continuous monitoring. Sigma drafts and summarises; the AO authorizes.

• Six-step RMF workflow with AO authorization gate and continuous monitoring
• Compliance score (Strong / Acceptable / Weak / Unacceptable) and ATO recommendation table
• POA&M lifecycle with verification, AO risk acceptance and overdue escalation
• Control catalogue by SP 800-53 family, assessments, versioned artifacts with SHA-256

Distilled from the hand-built SharePoint contracts platform and the EHRM DCC dashboards. A portfolio command center (stat strip, PoP runway, schedule, alerts, milestones), a contract cockpit (stats strip, burn vs. time, key dates, option-period Gantt, deliverable timeline, contract file, invoice and FPDS reconciliation, relationship graph), approvals inbox, document reconciliation center, agreements pipeline, companies & contacts and global search. Realistic seed data makes every page demo-ready on install.

• Portfolio command center with stat strip, PoP runway aging, schedule and live alert feed
• Contract cockpit: stats strip, burn vs. time-elapsed, key dates, option-period Gantt and deliverable timeline
• Document reconciliation: file register with confidence, signed-award vs. system checks
• Financial reconciliation: invoices vs. ledger and funded vs. FPDS with match rate and variance

Distilled from the SharePoint-integrated contracts pilot. Contracting Officers award and modify contracts, CORs accept deliverables and certify invoices, Finance releases payment and a vendor portal handles submissions. A weighted risk score (burn, PoP, funding, documentation, mods, invoicing) drives escalation and a closeout-readiness table gates the final close. Sigma summarises health, extracts deliverable data, drafts closeout memos and explains risk — humans decide.

• Contract lifecycle with award approval, option exercise and governed termination
• Invoice certification (COR) → payment release (Finance) with dispute loop
• Weighted contract-risk score with Low / Moderate / High / Critical bands
• Closeout-readiness decision table gating the final close

Distilled from the GovCon BD pilot and SAM.gov / USAspending research. A capture pipeline with an approval-gated bid/no-bid decision, a proposal workflow with pink, red and gold team reviews, and a five-factor pWin score that feeds a bid recommendation table. SAM.gov imports and USAspending look-ups keep the pipeline grounded; Sigma summarises, classifies fit, extracts dates, drafts the bid memo and recommends teaming — the BD Director decides.

• Capture pipeline with approval-gated bid/no-bid decision
• Five-factor pWin score with Long shot / Competitive / Favored / Must win bands
• Bid recommendation table (pWin × value × set-aside eligibility)
• Proposal workflow with pink, red and gold team reviews and page-limit guard

Supervisors rate six core competencies on a 1–5 scale while employees self-assess; the pack computes an equally weighted readiness score, maps the average rating to the DLA readiness bands (Very Strong to Critical), calibrates through HR and converts development priorities into approved, tracked training plans. Position gap analysis links required and current proficiency to recommended actions.

• Six-competency assessment with self vs supervisor ratings and gap
• Equal-weight readiness score and exact DLA bands (≥4.5 Very Strong … Critical)
• HR calibration gate with return loop and mandatory notes
• Training plans with approval, hours tracking and completion guard

Models the 1102 contracting workforce with the CMAR readiness score (CSI 45%, KPI 20%, tools 15%, preference 10%, mobility 10%) and Ready / Developing / Needs support / At risk bands. Program offices submit workload requests; branch chiefs triage, match by FAC-C level, CMAR band and utilisation using a fit table, and approve assignments. Certifications move through a renewal workflow with CLP tracking. Sigma recommends best-fit professionals and drafts assignment memos — chiefs decide.

• CMAR readiness score with exact weights and bands (Ready ≥80 … At risk <40)
• Workload request intake for program offices with rule-derived priority
• Assignment fit table: FAC-C level gap × CMAR band × utilisation
• Branch chief approval gate that creates the assignment record and notifies the requester

A portfolio control tower distilled from the VA IEO pilot and EHRM go-live readiness. Initiatives score readiness across scope, schedule, budget, staffing, risk and stakeholder health with an executive RAG heatmap; sites pass a program-office readiness review and an executive go/no-go gate; risks, issues, milestones and decisions are tracked against every initiative. Sigma summarises status, drafts briefs and recommends recovery — executives decide.

• Weighted readiness score with Green/Amber/Red decision table
• Executive RAG heatmap, risk matrix and go-live funnel
• Site readiness review and go/no-go approval gates (Go requires ≥ 80)
• Milestone variance, risk exposure, issue escalation and decision log

Stage-gated governance for a portfolio of pilots. Each pilot carries a hypothesis, budget, KPIs, risk register and stakeholder sentiment; a weighted value score (KPI attainment 35%, adoption 25%, satisfaction 15%, budget discipline 15%, technical risk 10%) drives a decision table that recommends Transition (≥80), Continue (≥75), Extend (≥60) or Stop. Portfolio directors approve proposals, gate panels record outcomes and an executive decision gate closes the loop, with extensions looping back to execution. Sigma summarises status, drafts gate packs and recommends decisions — the director decides.

• Weighted pilot value score with exact Transition / Continue / Extend / Stop bands
• Lifecycle with approval gate, gate review and executive decision gate (extend loops back)
• Portfolio dashboard: kanban by stage, value leaderboard, funnel and risk matrix
• KPI register with computed attainment and staleness alerts

Distilled from the SCM pilot (Supply Nexus). Shipments are tracked from plan to delivery with an at-risk / delayed loop and an approval gate for expedite spend. A six-factor risk score (inventory cover, weather, carrier reliability, route congestion, customs, single-source) maps to Critical / High / Medium / Low and a mitigation table recommends expedite, reroute, reallocate or monitor. Disruption events run reported → assessing → mitigating → resolved; suppliers acknowledge POs and update ETAs through a portal. Sigma summarises impact, explains risk, drafts supplier notices and classifies disruptions — planners decide.

• Shipment lifecycle with at-risk / delayed loop and expedite approval gate
• Six-factor shipment risk score (0–100) with Critical / High / Medium / Low bands
• Mitigation decision table: band × priority → expedite / reroute / reallocate / monitor
• Disruption response workflow fed by a webhook alert feed

Distilled from the ECFS records pilot and federal records-schedule practice. Case files carry a records schedule, a derived disposition date, a weighted materiality tier and a completeness score. Destruction or transfer is approved by the Records Officer and blocked while a litigation hold or open access request exists. FOIA and Privacy Act requests run through legal review to release, partial release or denial with cited exemptions. Sigma summarises, classifies and extracts document metadata, recommends schedules and drafts determination letters — humans decide.

• Disposition date derived from closure + schedule retention
• Materiality tiers (Tier 1 ≥ 70, Tier 2 40–69, Tier 3 < 40) with explainable score
• Disposition gate: holds and open access requests block destruction
• FOIA / Privacy Act workflow with exemptions (b)(1)–(b)(9) and legal-review approval

Distilled from the DLP Recon pilot. Two sources are loaded and matched under governed mapping rules; confidence is tiered exact / probable / weak / no match. Every disputed record becomes an exception with a root cause and resolution; write-offs and manual adjustments at or above $10,000 route to the Finance Controller. Runs carry a weighted quality score and close with a sign-off memo. Sigma summarises, classifies root causes, recommends resolutions and drafts the memo — humans decide.

• DLP match tiers (exact ≥ 99, probable ≥ 88, weak ≥ 25)
• Weighted run-quality score with sign-off gate
• Approval routing for write-offs and manual adjustments ≥ $10,000
• Exception kanban, root-cause leaderboard and match-rate gauge vs 99% target